Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 5272 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of Phenom II X4 925
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 59% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Phenom II X4 925 - 167 vs 105 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 32 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€472.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €472.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom II X4 925 | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i9 |
Deneb | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |