Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 5355 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of Phenom II X4 925
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 156% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Phenom II X4 925 - 558 vs 218 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 28 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Core i7-14700F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom II X4 925 | vs | Core i7-14700F |
|---|---|---|
| May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Deneb | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 20 |
| 4 | Threads | 28 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
