Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 4642 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of Phenom II X4 925
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 20% better in Elden Ring than Phenom II X4 925 - 131 vs 109 FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 58 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 8 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Core i3-12100F
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom II X4 925 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
|---|---|---|
| May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
| Phenom II X4 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Deneb | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
