Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms Xeon X5690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 2990 days newer than Xeon X5690.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 11% better in Elden Ring than Xeon X5690 - 124 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon X5690 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5690 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5690 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon X5690
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Core i9-9900
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5690 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
