Buy on Amazon
€117.19
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $278
Availability
MSRP in USD: $278
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770 outperforms Xeon X5690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3770 is 440 days newer than Xeon X5690.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5690
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 1% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Xeon X5690 - 164 vs 163 FPS
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than Intel Xeon X5690 - 77 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5690 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Core i7-3770
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
164
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€117.19
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-3770 Quad-Core Prozessor (3,4 GHz, 4 Core LGA 1155, BX80637I73770)
Buy for €117.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Xeon X5690
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Core i7-3770
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5690 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 77 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Xeon X5690 or Core i7-3770
Forza Horizon 5, 1920 x 1080, Max
9 FPS
€86.33/FPS
GeForce RTX 3050
Core i7-3770
8 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
€777
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
