Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670T outperforms Xeon X5680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4670T is 1204 days newer than Xeon X5680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5680
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670T
- Performs up to 7% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon X5680 - 164 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than Intel Xeon X5680 - 45 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
164
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€288
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €288 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2010
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5680 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670T |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 45 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |