Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Xeon X5677 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2725 days newer than Xeon X5677.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5677
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 7% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon X5677 - 344 vs 321 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5677 - 16 vs 8 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5677 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |