Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900T outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900T is 3977 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900T
- Performs up to 83% better in War Thunder than Xeon X5675 - 242 vs 132 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5675 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Xeon X5675
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Core i9-12900T
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900T |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 16 |
| 12 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.4 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
