Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4712MQ outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4712MQ is 790 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5675
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4712MQ - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4712MQ
- Performs up to 8% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon X5675 - 98 vs 91 FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon X5675 - 37 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5675 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Mobile • Apr 14th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | Intel Core i7-4712MQ |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 14th, 2013 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 37 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |