Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2680 v3 outperforms Xeon X5670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2680 v3 is 1637 days newer than Xeon X5670.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5670
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 95 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Performs up to 8% better in Minecraft than Xeon X5670 - 650 vs 601 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5670 - 24 vs 12 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5670 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Xeon | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |