Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms Xeon X5660 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 3325 days newer than Xeon X5660.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 41% better in Starfield than Xeon X5660 - 62 vs 44 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon X5660 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5660 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5660 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5660 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |