Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900T outperforms Xeon X5650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900T is 3325 days newer than Xeon X5650.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900T
- Performs up to 7% better in God of War than Xeon X5650 - 174 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon X5650 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5650 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5650 doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon X5650
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i9-9900T
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5650 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900T |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
