Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms Xeon X5650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 4677 days newer than Xeon X5650.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5650
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 11% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon X5650 - 165 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than Intel Xeon X5650 - 60 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5650 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
165
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.93/FPS
100%
Price, €
€152.92
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €152.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5650 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 60 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |