Key Differences
In short — Xeon X5650 outperforms Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon X5650 is 808 days older than Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5650
- Performs up to 1% better in Lost Ark than Celeron G550 - 223 vs 220 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon X5650 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5650 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5650 | vs | Intel Celeron G550 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Xeon | Collection | Celeron |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |