Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms Xeon X5650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6350 is 1140 days newer than Xeon X5650.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5650
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 8% better in Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered than Xeon X5650 - 42 vs 39 FPS
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon X5650
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5650 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Xeon | Collection | FX |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
