Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms Xeon W3690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 2200G is 2555 days newer than Xeon W3690.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3690
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Performs up to 10% better in Dota 2 than Xeon W3690 - 188 vs 171 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3690 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3690 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
188
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €74.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3690 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Gulftown | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |