Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 4677 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3680
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100F - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 17% better in Elden Ring than Xeon W3680 - 131 vs 112 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
131
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
100%
Price, €
€111.29
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €111.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 395 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3680 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |