Buy on Amazon
€20.16
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon W3680 outperforms Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W3680 is 537 days older than Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3680
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G530 - 112 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3680 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Celeron G530
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
109
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G530 CPU verwendet 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 2,4 GHz 2M 65W LGA1155
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 342 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon W3680
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Celeron G530
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3680 | vs | Intel Celeron G530 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
| Xeon | Collection | Celeron |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
