Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms Xeon W3670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 3532 days newer than Xeon W3670.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 66% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon W3670 - 406 vs 244 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3670 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3670 - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3670 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon W3670
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2010
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3670 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 10 |
| 12 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
