Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3240 outperforms Xeon W3565 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3240 is 1037 days newer than Xeon W3565.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3565
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Xeon W3565 - 112 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Xeon W3565 - 55 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3565 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon W3565
Server/Workstation • Nov 1st, 2009
Core i3-3240
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3565 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
