Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Xeon W3565 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 4447 days newer than Xeon W3565.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3565
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than Xeon W3565 - 124 vs 111 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3565 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon W3565
Server/Workstation • Nov 1st, 2009
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3565 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Xeon | Collection | Celeron |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
