Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600K outperforms Xeon W3550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14600K is 5182 days newer than Xeon W3550.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600K
- Performs up to 86% better in Starfield than Xeon W3550 - 82 vs 44 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3550 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3550 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
82
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.8/FPS
100%
Price, €
€311.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €311.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 142 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 9th, 2009
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3550 | vs | Intel Core i5-14600K |
---|---|---|
Aug 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |