Key Differences
In short — FX-4300 outperforms Xeon W3530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4300 is 952 days newer than Xeon W3530.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3530
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Performs up to 0% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Xeon W3530 - 274 vs 273 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon W3530 - 95 vs 130 Watts
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
274
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€29.22
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €29.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 633 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3530 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon | Collection | FX |
Bloomfield | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |