Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 5038 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 41% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon W3520 - 211 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3520 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3520 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3520 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
211
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€351.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €351.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |