Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 4117 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 8% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Xeon W3520 - 175 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon W3520 - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3520 - 24 vs 8 threads
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
175
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€579.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €579.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 778 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 105 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |