Buy on Amazon
€35
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $2999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $2999
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-3175X outperforms Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-3175X is 2340 days newer than Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i3-3220 - 243 vs 230 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 56 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 55 vs 255 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-3175X doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i3-3220 3,30 GHz 3M SR0RG Sockel 1155 Ivy Bridge CPU Prozessor Erneuert
Buy for €35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65395 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W-3175X
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Core i3-3220
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3220
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
35.64154786150713%
Multi-Core
1085
7.913931436907366%
Intel Xeon W-3175X | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Core i3 |
| Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
28 | Cores | 2 |
56 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 255 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.