Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-3175X outperforms Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-3175X is 776 days older than Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Performs up to 4% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-10105F - 182 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 56 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 65 vs 255 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
175
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€70.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €70.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10363 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-3175X | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jan 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon W | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
28 | Cores | 4 |
56 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
255 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |