Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-2135 outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-2135 is 1086 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-2135
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 190 vs 189 FPS
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon W-2135 - 105 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W-2135 - 20 vs 12 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W-2135
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2017
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
886
63.37625178826896%
Multi-Core
5378
82.20727606236625%
Intel Xeon W-2135 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 10 |
| 12 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
