Key Differences
In short — Pentium G645 outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G645 is 901 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5645
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645
- Performs up to 0% better in Dishonored 2 than Xeon E5645 - 255 vs 254 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5645 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5645 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5645
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Pentium G645
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | Intel Pentium G645 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2012 |
| Xeon | Collection | Pentium |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
