Buy on Amazon
€154.27
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $278
Availability
MSRP in USD: $278
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770 outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3770 is 775 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5645
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 2% better in Rocket League than Xeon E5645 - 682 vs 669 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon E5645 - 77 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5645 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Core i7-3770
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
682
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€154.27
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-3770 Quad-Core Prozessor (3,4 GHz, 4 Core LGA 1155, BX80637I73770)
Buy for €154.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16270 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Xeon E5645
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i7-3770
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 77 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Xeon E5645 or Core i7-3770
Rocket League, 1920 x 1080, High Quality
165 FPS
€4.71/FPS
GeForce RTX 3050
Core i7-3770
8 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
€777
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
