Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1840 outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1840 is 1507 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5645
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 3% better in Ready or Not than Xeon E5645 - 236 vs 230 FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Xeon E5645 - 53 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5645 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5645
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Xeon | Collection | Celeron |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 80 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
