Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700 is 2956 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Performs up to 5% better in Rocket League than Xeon E5620 - 702 vs 670 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5620 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5620 - 16 vs 8 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
702
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€261.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €261.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 229 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |