Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 3400 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 80 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 20% better in Lost Ark than Xeon E5620 - 265 vs 220 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5620 - 12 vs 8 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5620
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Ryzen 5 3600X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
