Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Core i5-4590 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 908 days newer than Core i5-4590.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-4590 - 123 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4590 - 44 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4590
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 84 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Core i5-4590
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-4590
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1126
95.82978723404256%
Multi-Core
3140
32.6437259590394%
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-4590 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 4 |
44 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 145 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
