Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Core i5-3470 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 1607 days newer than Core i5-3470.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-3470 - 201 vs 193 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470 - 44 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 77 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Core i5-3470
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3470
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
622
52.93617021276595%
Multi-Core
1840
19.128807568354297%
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-3470 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 4 |
44 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 145 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
