Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 827 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 8% better in Starfield than Core i3-4160T - 55 vs 51 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 44 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 35 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 2 |
44 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 145 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
