Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 827 days newer than Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-4160 - 236 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 44 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 54 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Core i3-4160
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4160
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
90.55319148936171%
Multi-Core
2072
21.5407006965381%
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 2 |
44 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 145 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
