Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 985 days older than Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 1% better in Watch Dogs: Legion than Ryzen 3 3200G - 137 vs 135 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 44 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 65 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Watch Dogs: Legion
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €63.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76815 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
89.53191489361703%
Multi-Core
3013
31.323422393180167%
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Broadwell | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 4 |
44 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |