Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Xeon E5-2698 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1486 days newer than Xeon E5-2698 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 135 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Borderlands 3 than Xeon E5-2698 v3 - 219 vs 214 FPS
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Buy for €349.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65287 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
1024
80.3767660910518%
Multi-Core
7422
99.57070029514354%
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
135 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |