Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2696 v3 outperforms Core i3-2120T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2696 v3 is 1100 days newer than Core i3-2120T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3
- Performs up to 9% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i3-2120T - 127 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120T - 36 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120T
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-2696 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i3-2120T
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-2120T |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell E | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
18 | Cores | 2 |
36 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| Not Available | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
