Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3250 outperforms Xeon E5-2695 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3250 is 84 days older than Xeon E5-2695 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Xeon E5-2695 v2 - 117 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 - 55 vs 115 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
115 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |