Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4170 outperforms Xeon E5-2690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4170 is 786 days newer than Xeon E5-2690.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4170 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4170
- Performs up to 8% better in Lost Ark than Xeon E5-2690 - 246 vs 227 FPS
- Consumes up to 60% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 - 54 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2690 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €145.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65336 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 | vs | Intel Core i3-4170 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
135 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |