Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3500X outperforms Xeon E5-2690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3500X is 2758 days newer than Xeon E5-2690.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3500X - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
- Performs up to 15% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2690 - 134 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 - 65 vs 135 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€231.18
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €231.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17831 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3500X |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 24th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
135 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |