Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2690 v3 outperforms Ryzen 5 3550H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2690 v3 is 1581 days older than Ryzen 5 3550H.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
- Performs up to 5% better in The Callisto Protocol than Ryzen 5 3550H - 99 vs 94 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3550H - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 - 35 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Single-Core
942
89.28909952606635%
Multi-Core
2845
40.469416785206256%
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3550H |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
135 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | No |