Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Xeon E5-2687W on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 3857 days newer than Xeon E5-2687W.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2687W
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 150 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 29% better in Borderlands 3 than Xeon E5-2687W - 260 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2687W - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2687W doesn't have integrated graphics
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
260
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€385.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €385.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2687W | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 170 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |