Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Xeon E5-2687W v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 2250 days newer than Xeon E5-2687W v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 16% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon E5-2687W v3 - 193 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 - 105 vs 160 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 - 24 vs 20 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€279.29
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €279.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 12 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
160 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |