Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms Xeon E5-2680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700X is 1822 days newer than Xeon E5-2680.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
- Performs up to 15% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2680 - 181 vs 158 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 - 95 vs 130 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
181
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€116.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €116.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2680 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700X |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |