Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2680 outperforms Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2680 is 917 days newer than Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680
- Performs up to 3% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Phenom II X4 830 - 119 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2680 | vs | AMD Phenom II X4 830 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2009 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Phenom II X4 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Deneb |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | No |