Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 3422 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 16% better in The Last of Us Part I than Xeon E5-2680 v2 - 149 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 - 65 vs 115 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 - 24 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
149
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€363.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €363.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15595 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 12 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |