Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100 outperforms Xeon E5-2673 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8100 is 1123 days newer than Xeon E5-2673 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield 2042 than Xeon E5-2673 v3 - 159 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
159
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.95/FPS
100%
Price, €
€151.03
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €151.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10948 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-8100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
105 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |